The nomination of Lana Nusseibeh, a diplomat from the United Arab Emirates, for the role of United Nations Secretary-General has sparked opposition from Sudanese diaspora groups and international human rights organizations. Critics are concerned about her past defense of the UAE against allegations of supporting Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), raising doubts about her independence and suitability for the position.
The UAE’s decision to put forth Nusseibeh as a candidate to replace the outgoing UN Secretary-General António Guterres has generated debate amidst ongoing allegations regarding the UAE’s involvement in Sudan’s civil conflict. Human rights organizations have frequently accused the UAE of backing the RSF, a group implicated in extensive human rights abuses against civilians, including an attack on El Fasher in October 2025, which the UN described as potentially genocidal.
Hala al-Karib, a Sudanese women’s rights and pro-democracy activist, voiced concerns about Nusseibeh’s ability to act independently of her government’s stance on Sudan, suggesting that her approval could hinder justice efforts for atrocity victims in the country. Other activists argue that her appointment could erode public trust in the UN’s capacity to hold powerful governments accountable for conflict-related actions.
Former Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth has also expressed skepticism about Nusseibeh’s responses to claims of UAE support for the RSF, highlighting worries about her commitment to accountability. Despite these criticisms, Nusseibeh has defended her candidacy by condemning the RSF’s actions in Sudan and pledging to back UN efforts in accountability and transitional justice if appointed.
Nusseibeh has taken a leave of absence from her ministerial role in the UAE, citing the independence required of a UN Secretary-General. The selection process involves securing at least nine affirmative votes from the 15-member UN Security Council, while avoiding a veto from any of its five permanent members: the United States, the United Kingdom, China, France, and Russia.
As the leadership race intensifies, with former Costa Rican vice-president Rebeca Grynspan previously seen as a strong contender, the controversies surrounding Nusseibeh’s nomination add complexity to the selection process. This situation underscores broader concerns about the autonomy of international institutions in ensuring accountability for alleged human rights violations during conflicts.